Accurate prediction of project duration and cost remains one of the most challenging aspects of project management, particularly in resource-constrained and interdependent task networks. Traditional analytical techniques such as the Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) rely on simplified and often static assumptions regarding task interdependencies and resource performance. This study proposes a novel resource-based predictive framework that integrates network representations of project activities with graph neural networks (GNNs) to capture structural and contextual relationships among tasks, resources, and time-cost dynamics. The model represents the project as a heterogeneous activity-resource graph in which nodes denote activities and resources, and edges encode temporal and resource dependencies. We evaluate multiple learning paradigms, including GraphSAGE and Temporal Graph Networks, on both synthetic and benchmark project datasets. Experimental results show that the proposed GNN framework achieves an average 23 to 31 percent reduction in mean absolute error compared to traditional regression and tree-based methods, while improving the coefficient of determination R2 from approximately 0.78 to 0.91 for large and complex project networks. Furthermore, the learned embeddings provide interpretable insights into resource bottlenecks and critical dependencies, enabling more explainable and adaptive scheduling decisions.

Our focus is on projects, i.e., business processes, which are emerging as the economic drivers of our times. Differently from day-to-day operational processes that do not require detailed planning, a project requires planning and resource-constrained scheduling for coordinating resources across sub- or related projects and organizations. A planner in charge of project planning has to select a set of activities to perform, determine their precedence constraints, and schedule them according to temporal project constraints. We suggest a data-driven project planning approach for classes of projects such as infrastructure building and information systems development projects. A project network is first learned from historical records. The discovered network relaxes temporal constraints embedded in individual projects, thus uncovering where planning and scheduling flexibility can be exploited for greater benefit. Then, the network, which contains multiple project plan variations, from which one has to be selected, is enriched by identifying decision rules and frequent paths. The planner can rely on the project network for: 1) decoding a project variation such that it forms a new project plan, and 2) applying resource-constrained project scheduling procedures to determine the project's schedule and resource allocation. Using two real-world project datasets, we show that the suggested approach may provide the planner with significant flexibility (up to a 26% reduction of the critical path of a real project) to adjust the project plan and schedule. We believe that the proposed approach can play an important part in supporting decision making towards automated data-driven project planning.

To effectively generate a fast and consistent apartment construction project network, Hyundai Engineering and Construction and Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology developed a case-and constraint-based project-planning expert system for an apartment domain. The reason we chose the case-and constraintbased approach is intuitive. Second, during system development, crosschecking of cases with constraints improves the quality of both of them. Through the crosschecking process, the system developers can refine the previous cases to the high-quality referential cases and simultaneously validate and verify the domain constraints. In the area of project management, there has been a lot of research and development of network-based project-planning methods and management techniques, assuming that a project network is given to the project manager (Bent and Thumann 1994).

It is a known fact that the performance of optimization algorithms for NP-Hard problems vary from instance to instance. We observed the same trend when we comprehensively studied multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) on a six benchmark instances of discrete time-cost trade-off problem (DTCTP) in a construction project. In this paper, instead of using a single algorithm to solve DTCTP, we use a portfolio approach that takes multiple algorithms as its constituent. We proposed portfolio comprising of four MOEAs, Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), the strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm II (SPEA-II), Pareto archive evolutionary strategy (PAES) and Niched Pareto Genetic Algorithm II (NPGA-II) to solve DTCTP. The result shows that the portfolio approach is computationally fast and qualitatively superior to its constituent algorithms for all benchmark instances. Moreover, portfolio approach provides an insight in selecting the best algorithm for all benchmark instances of DTCTP.

To effectively generate a fast and consistent apartment construction project network, Hyundai Engineering and Construction and Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology developed a case- and constraint-based project-planning expert system for an apartment domain. The system, FAS-TRAK- APT, is inspired by the use of previous cases by a human expert project planner for planning a new project and the modification of these cases by the project planner using his/her knowledge of domain constraints. This large-scale, case-based, and mixed-initiative planning system, integrated with intensive constraint-based adaptation, utilizes semantic-level metaconstraints and human decisions for compensating incomplete cases imbedding specific planning knowledge. The case- and constraint-based architecture inherently supports cross-checking cases with constraints during system development and maintenance. This system has drastically reduced the time and effort required for initial project planning, improved the quality and completeness of the generated plans, and is expected to give the company the competitive advantage in contract bids for new contracts.

Austin Tate Department of Artificial Intelligence University of Edinburgh Edinburgh Scotland Abstract Procedures for optimization and resource allocation in Operations Research first require a project network for the task to be specified. The specification of a project network is at present done in an intuitive way. AI work in plan formation has developed formalisms for specifying primitive activities, and recent work by Sacerdoti (1975a) has developed a planner able to generate a plan as a partially ordered network of actions. The "planning: a joint AI/OR approach" project at Edinburgh has extended such work and provided a hierarchic planner which can aid in the generation of project networks. This paper describes the planner (NONLIN) and the Task Formalism (TF) used to hierarchically specify a domain. Current work in Operations Research (OR) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) has concentrated on different aspects of the problem. We have taken an interdisciplinary approach in the hope that this will lead to a development of both these aspects. In the OR approach, the planning process falls into two stages. The constituent "jobs" of a plan are specified together with their precedence relationships (i.e.

We describe work on a project aimed at producing an interactive program for the construction of project networks (e.g. for house building tasks). To do this we have developed a planner which can form plans epresented as a partiQlly ordered netwo k of actions. A formalism (TF) is given for describing a domain in a hierarchic fashion. The representation of plans and the planner (NONLIN) are fully explained. During this work, a general technique was developed for answering queries about Q situation when the informQtion about the world is stored as a partiQlly ordered network of alterations made to some initial situation. We give a general procedure for recognizing and correcting for interactions between actions in the network. This is based on an analysis of the goal structure of the problem. The work is compared to that of Sacerdoti (l975a) who pioneered the techniques of planning using plans represented as partially ordered networks of actions.